|
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
|
ICEFAT
Newsletter #1 2006 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
NO
ESCORT TO AEROPLANES
|
|
|
|
| |
When
a museum or gallery asks for airport supervision, they usually
expect their chosen agents to be able to escort their cases to
the aeroplane door. The reality is that this kind of service has
become increasingly difficult and in some cases impossible to
arrange.
|
|
| |
Security procedures have been increasing in leaps
and bounds since 1988, when a Pan Am flight was targeted by terrorists
and exploded in mid-air above Lockerbie in Scotland. The source
of the explosion was discovered to be a suitcase in the cargo hold,
which had managed to slip through the security net. Ever since then
cargo has been subjected to careful scrutiny.
DIFFERENT PROCEDURES
The difficulty when arranging witness loads for valuable and fragile
artworks is not only that each airline seems to have completely
different procedures, but that those procedures can also vary from
airport to airport, even when dealing with large airlines with an
international presence.
Some key factors in whether agents are granted airside access are:
|
|
• Local regulations. In the UK, agents are not allowed
to accompany a case all the way onto an aircraft unless they have
an airside pass. In order to obtain an airside pass, an agent
must be security vetted and have been authorized to carry a pass.
There is no official limit to the number of passes which a company
may apply for, but in practice airside passes are rationed.
• The size of the airport. Larger airports are more likely
to consider themselves as being at risk and are therefore more
cautious about granting airside access. Smaller airports have
the luxury of knowing the few freight agents who visit them by
sight, while the largest airports have hundreds of agents working
on site every day. Even with an airside pass, airside access is
not guaranteed at all airports.
• The location of the airline’s warehouses. Some airlines
allow agents and couriers to witness the palletisation of cases;
but only by prior arrangement and only if their warehouse is located
within the airport. Agents in the UK have been refused access
to airline warehouses purely because the warehouse was located
outside of the airport perimeter.
• The types of aircraft in an airline’s fleet. If
your cases have been booked onto a flight which happens to be
a freighter aircraft, couriers may not be allowed to accompany
them and airside access is more likely to be denied.
• The airline’s normal loading procedures. Some airlines
have automated warehouses for the loading of cargo and to them
even a simple witness load is a nuisance. On many occasions agents
have had to pay for an entire pallet just for the privilege of
witnessing the loading of one case. Another problem with using
airlines who usually use automated warehouses is that they will
not allow anyone into the warehouse itself. The best that an agent
can hope for is to be allowed to watch their shipment being loaded
on CCTV in a separate room, which really does not compensate for
the lack of airside access.
|
| |
As the world changes so does the ability of your art logistics
agent to obtain airline warehouse and tarmac access.
|
|
By
Val Cox, Martinspeed, UK and Tim Lock, Gander & White, UK
|
|
|